![]() In addition to the newly added technologies, the A/TX has a cut- and chip-resistant tread compound built into its fabrication. Consequently, both of these tires perform well on rugged terrains. Additionally, its shoulder lugs provide a moral grip on rocks and gravel. Likewise, the AT2 is made with a cut and chip resistance compound that makes it agile and sturdy to handle rough terrain. All of these elements work together to protect the tire from abrasions and enhance traction on rugged terrain. AT/X is built with a robust compound and features Alternating shoulder scoops along with stone bumpers and sidewall protection lugs. Rugged tires have a higher chance of surviving on rugged terrains like rocks and gravel. Therefore, the AT2 performs better on mud terrains.Ĭontact zone on the snow, the AT/X has a better grip on hard snow.Īdditionally, both of these tires can be fitted with metal studs to improve their snow traction. The AT2 has a tread design with bigger and better grooves, as well as extra sipes, and more scarce shoulders than the ATX.īecause of these features, the AT2 is able to do an excellent job of cleaning up mud. The AT2 can therefore grab and throw soft snow more effectively than the AT/X and move across with greater efficiency.Īs a result, the A/TX has decent grooves in its tread design for digging deep into mud and self-cleaning ability, allowing it to function effectively through mud. Both the AT/X and AT2 feature three-peak mountain snowflake ratings. The Off-road Traction The Snowįor a tire to perform well on snow, it must have a snow rating. The AT/X shines brighter on dry roads, while the AT2 excels on wet roads. The grooves allow the tire to collect and disperse water to avoid hydroplaning and work exceptionally well on wet roads. On the other hand, the AT2’s tread blocks and shoulders have fairly large grooves. In addition, its wider shoulders make it easier to handle on the road. As a result of the increased rolling resistance, the AT/X performs better on dry roads by virtue of having a little bit more surface area than the AT2. Tires with a loftier footprint perform better on dry roads. This makes the AT2 more suitable for soft surfaces.Ī/TX has somewhat reduced grooves and superior shoulders, resulting in just a little bit bigger footprint. The shoulders of AT2 have shorter tread blocks with more incisions and wider grooves. Video Comparison of General Grabber ATX Vs AT2 Vs AT3Ĭomparison of the General Grabber ATX Vs AT2 Vs AT3Ī/TX and AT2 have very similar tread designs, both of which have a five-row tread pattern with the major difference being in the shoulders.Comparison of General Grabber AT3 and A/TX.Comparison of the General Grabber AT2 and AT3. ![]() Comparison of the General Grabber ATX Vs AT2 Vs AT3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |